Addressing WG Tracker
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Action Items | |||||
# |
Date |
Action |
Status |
Owner |
Due Date |
1 |
3/26/2010 |
Next time we will do a better job to prep everyone with pointers to all of the necessary information | |||
2 |
3/26/2010 |
Read over material that has been created to date |
|||
3 |
3/26/2010 |
Propose 2-3 topics of discussion that we can focus on for next week |
|||
4 |
3/31/2010 |
Arien will formalize proposal on table in draft spec |
Complete |
Arien |
|
5 |
3/31/2010 |
Group will review with goal of calling for consensus next meeting |
Open |
All |
|
6 |
4/7/2010 |
Move example sections off to a separate example section of and just having one normative section describing what a health internet address looks like |
Completed |
Arien |
4/14/10 |
7 |
4/7/2010 |
Review revised document and vote on whether this can be moved to the larger implementation group |
Open |
All |
4/14/10 |
8 |
4/16/2010 |
Amend Health Domain Name sentence read: |
Closed |
Arien |
4/20/2010 |
Organizations that manage Health Domain Names MUST maintain directory NHIN Direct HISP Address Directory entries for the Health Domain Name, as specified by the Abstract Model , and corresponding to the rules established for concrete implementations. For example, for a REST implementation, organizations will include implementations of the Abstract Model. Organizations that manage Health Domain Names MUST ensure that transactions are available for Health Endpoint Names, either A through proprietary means or CNAME DNS RRs, for an SMTP-based implementation, the following the Destination role transactions of the Abstract Model. Organizations may take on the HISP role or assign this function to another organization will maintain at least one MX DNS RR. playing the HISP role. | |||||
9 |
4/16/2010 |
Ensure REST/IHE and SMTP concrete implementation Straw Cases to use health information exchange mapping |
Open |
Arien |
4/20/2010 |
10 |
4/16/2010 |
Ensure that the Health Endpoint Name is responsible for routing the end the transaction is received to the endpoint |
Closed |
Arien |
4/20/2010 |
11 |
4/16/2010 |
Insert Version Number |
Closed |
Arien |
4/20/2010 |
12 |
4/16/2010 |
Workgroup will vote for consensus |
Open |
Arien |
4/20/2010 |
13 |
4/21/2010 |
Open |
All |
4/27/10 | |
14 |
4/21/2010 |
Arien/Karen will write in a revised wording for the text under Health Domain Name |
Open |
Arien/Karen |
4/27/10 |
15 |
4/21/2010 |
Arien or Honora will send a definitive email on Mondays as to whether or not a Thursday Addressing WG meeting will be held |
Open |
Honora/Arien |
Ongoing |
Key Decisions |
|||||
# |
Date |
Decision |
|||
1 |
3/31/2010 |
Wes is WG Leader |
|||
2 |
3/31/2010 |
We want to use only the most commonly used and well supported features of any standard |
|||
3 |
3/31/2010 |
The addressing spec needs three components: |
|||
1. End point receiver (ex: wesj) |
|||||
2. Domain name -- business organization (ex: Rishel.com) associated with the end point |
|||||
3. Mapped through an external routing organization or technology organization (ex: Google or Gmail) |
|||||
4 |
3/31/2010 |
Treat patient address in the same way (has the same three parts) as above |
|||